A Matter of Life and Death
There are crises that, in a unique way, reveal our beliefs in an immediate way. These index crises expose one’s worldview; what is right, what is wrong, and in the Terry Schiavo case, what is the value of human life? It’s difficult to sort out the real issues from the more peripheral ones because so many have said so much in the last week. Did Terry Schiavo say that she would rather die than live in a “vegetative state?” Is she aware of her surroundings (family, care-givers, etc)? Is no hope of recovery or improvement grounds for removing her feeding tube? Has the government (legislative or judicial) over-stepped its bounds? Is the sanctity of marriage under attack by those who want to deny Terry Schiavo’s husband the right to make medical decisions on her behalf? Do her parents have any legal or moral rights in this matter? Is quality of life a determining factor in whether one should live or die?
Mercy killing is not a new phenomenon in our society. Dr. Kevorkian’s suicide machine, books such as “Final Exit,” and Clint Eastwood’s Academy award winning, “Million Dollar Baby,” have all pushed the right-to-die movement forward. Terry Schiavo’s now famous case has revealed in a new and horrifying way the extent of the moral anarchy of our age. But the question that stands first in line is: “Is mercy killing ever morally permissible or justifiable (and) are there cases where it would be morally obligatory to remove a patient’s suffering?” A Christian response is necessary.
There are moral absolutes. God has established a moral creation because He is a moral Being. The Terry Schiavo story has become the occasion for a major worldview clash (Christian theism versus naturalism). The principle of life informs a Christian belief. God gives life and only He can authorize any taking of human life. Human government does not have autonomous rights. It cannot create rights. Suicide is wrong because it is self-murder. The sanctity of human life has its roots in Christian teaching. The principle of death is an issue. Death is not a friend but an enemy. The last enemy to be destroyed is death and that will happen because of the death of death in the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ. Those who have not experienced God’s pardon of sin in Christ and who are counting on their own good works to take them to heaven are deluded. The gaping jaws of eternal separation from God in hell await those whose only preparation for physical death is a living will.
Murder is wrong. Scripture forbids the taking of innocent life of creatures made in God’s image. It is not a coincidence that many of those who want Terry Schiavo to die are also advocates of abortion on demand. The principle of suffering is vital. Suffering can be an opportunity to glorify God. Affliction can have meaning because of the meaning of Jesus Christ’s death on the cross. Joni Eareckson Tada is a living testimony how “God transformed an immature and headstrong teenager into a self-reliant young woman who is learning to rejoice in suffering.” I am not surprised that a culture of death is developing. Suffering without God is a bleak outlook.
Healing and loving care-giving are also potent factors in times of great pain. God may choose to heal. Recovery is sometimes possible and should not be ruled out. Comfort and help for the hurting are always right. Even in those cases where recovery and improvement may not be possible, merciful care should be given. And for the Christian there is always the hope of a future resurrection body when all things will be made new. The principle of precedent should guide our thinking as well. This is sometimes called the wedge principle or the slippery slope argument. The practice of so-called mercy killing sets a dangerous precedent. It all starts with an attitude that there is such a thing as life not worthy to be lived. In the words of one ethicist, “One might want to limit the breadth of the category of people who qualify for euthanasia, but once it is decided that certain people are to die, it is hard to find any logical grounds for keeping others alive.” While there seem to be some legitimate legal concerns involved in Schiavo’s case, there are those guilty of moral turpitude seeking to hide behind the skirts of a judicial process. It is possible to be legally right and morally wrong.
The confusion over which handicapped and incapacitated people get to live and those who should die is a dilemma of modern man’s own making. The inability to think discerningly and morally is due to the judgment of God (“Therefore God gave them over in the lusts of their hearts …” Romans 1:18ff). When man wants to live without God there will be nothing but the increasing loss of moral perspective. So then, is the removal of Terry Schiavo’s feeding tube a merciful act? No. What man calls mercy may not be mercy. It may be murder. But God has revealed His mercy in His Son, Jesus Christ. The empty tomb of Jesus Christ offers us our only hope in a world that views personal existence as only a matter of life and death.
Dr. Howard E. Dial
Berachah Bible Church
